the training was successful, with pupils, who laid the beginning of a professional attitude to the day, the fly is not a social figurehead, but a technical and mental challenge.
was therefore a goal-oriented training - as a mechanical engineer with a technical knowledge-biased - and consequently be quite compact, and each unit a huge step forward, a fact which also meant that the training in the minimum time - that target more than 300 landings and 65 and more hours before the practical test have, we have not sought - could be completed.
that the quality has not suffered among them, see the flying qualities of the pupil, where the device with much feeling and overview moved.
and, importantly, it also agreed with the chemicals, it had once again done the right people together, for me as an instructor of one of the most essential criteria of successful training.
if I'm feeling, aspirants with a PPL and its art or its settings I do not come across with - and I know that after the first talks leading to the training - then I let the finger-like, to myself and also for advantage of the pupil.
train with each student is not efficient, one must also see the need to fly students to not take, can easily be drawn.
my basic setting, each instructor, the student pilot he deserves, has to date always true ;-)
as its auditor, Michael Pammer, said he now has in writing that he can move the flying somewhat through the skies - that he does, and evolve in flying and will, I am convinced - another excellent pilot "on the clouds, where the freedom is boundless" [ lied to text in retro ].
0 comments:
Post a Comment